Abortion Wars

13 Jun

Let me start out by saying that I believe that Abortion should (with some carefully delineated exceptions) be legal. I do not believe that a fetus is human. For that matter, I am unconvinced that a newborn is human. However, I don’t think that I can prove either of these positions. Further, I am not persuaded that anyone else can either. Whenever the subject of abortion comes up on any of the several Blogs I read regularly, someone is bound to assert that Religion should not have anything to do with determining the limits or legality of abortion. Frankly, I find such assertions ridiculous on their face. What science actually knows about how the brain works is far from comprehensive, and what science knows about what makes each personality distinct can be inscribed on the head of a pin with a jackhammer. Since the core issue of abortion is when is a fetus a human being, and therefore when is it murder to terminate a pregnancy, any position is necessarily a matter of faith.

As matters stand, abortion is legal in all parts of the United States. But it is also under siege in almost all States, and its defenders appear to be unwilling to examine the motives and positions of their opponents with anything approaching honesty. Pro-abortion (or “Choice”) believers are far too prone to spin conspiracy theories about Religious Conservatives and their theoretical desire to “control women’s bodies”; they seem incapable to coming to grips with the simple proposition that anti-abortion (or “Pro-Life”) believers sincerely believe that all abortions are infanticide. One can, if one wants to make the effort, corner Pro-Abortion advocates into admitting that IF a fetus is human, and abortion is infanticide, then just about any action taken by Anti-Abortion advocates would be justified…but it makes no long-term impression. They either cannot or will not absorb the idea that their opponents might legitimately believe a different set of assumptions.

And this is why we are going to lose legal abortion in my lifetime.

Put bluntly: if the Anti-Abortion forces are right in their basic assumption about Abortion (that a fetus is human) then abortion is evil. At the same time, if the Pro-Abortion people are right in their basic assumption (that a fetus is not human), that has nothing to do with whether opposition to abortion is evil as opposed to simply mistaken. For opposition to abortion to be evil (which, frankly, is a position that the Pro-Abortion forces have taken) one has to assume that the Anti-Abortion forces are knowingly wrong about the humanity of a fetus and that they lie about their motives. There isn’t really a whole lot of evidence to support this view, and adopting it badly distorts Pro-Abortion strategy.

Because they (mostly) believe their own propaganda about Religious fanatics who want to control women, the Pro-Abortion faction is fighting bitterly to keep late-term abortions legal, and to stop the passage of parental notification laws. Both these positions are political poison.

No matter how well justified, late-term abortion looks like infanticide, will always look like infanticide, and tends to slide into infanticide, as the trial of Kermit Gosnell illustrates. By opposing legal limits of late-term abortions, Pro-Abortion advocates undermine their positions elsewhere.

Parental Notification is popular. Outside of the conspiracy fantasies of the Pro-Abortion extremists, the idea that a minor child should be able to undergo a significant medical procedure without parental approval or even knowledge is simply a non-starter. No amount of political ranting is going to convince any parent that a school nurse who isn’t authorized to give out aspirin without parental approval should have the authority to arrange an abortion for their daughter without telling them. I can, just barely, imagine a situation where getting a girl an abortion without telling her parents would be a good thing to do, but in each case I have managed to come up with a much better solution would be to get the girl made a ward of the court. In any case, situations that would actually justify not notifying parents to the satisfaction of the general public are very rare, and do not justify opposing parental notification laws because such laws are going to be passed and the cost of opposing them is the alienation of too many voters.

If it was simply the self-injury that the Pro-Abortion side does in public popularity by these positions, I might be able to shrug; most movements include a small but vociferous faction apparently bent on persuading the world that their cause is championed by a bunch of nuts. But the Pro-Abortion advocates are allowing their positions on these issues to drive them to take stances that are simply indefensible.

Kermit Gosnell is almost a caricature of the classic image of a back-alley illegal abortionist. Defending him may be simply a knee-jerk reaction based on never letting the Anti-Abortion position have a win, but jot makes the Pro-Abortion advocates look like they are far more interested in making sure minority babies die than in protecting the lives of minority women. Planned Parenthood has always been tainted by its founders dabbling eugenics, and this just smells like more of the same. If tolerating the existence of a pesthole like Gosnell’s clinic, and a butcher like Gosnell himself, is what is required to ‘allow minority women access to abortion’ then a major part of the point of legalizing abortion evaporates.

Similarly; attempts to evade existing parental notification laws are political disasters waiting to happen. Abortion is not a risk-free procedure. Sooner or later Pro-Abortion activists who try to help teens evade such laws are going to end up with the dead body of somebody else’s child on their hands. A child who – at least in the public mind – would not be dead if not for the interference of Pro-Abortion busybodies.

It is far too easy to forget that in any representative form of government, being right is not, politically speaking, enough. It is possible, even fairly common, to be right and still need to compromise. And if your actions show that a compromise with you cannot be trusted – by, say, you and yours cheerfully breaking laws that were legally arrived at – then your opponents have no reason to compromise with you.

The Pro-Abortion movement must learn to police its own, and to accept that its opponents have legal and moral rights. Or. It. Will. Fail.


10 Responses to “Abortion Wars”

  1. Atomic Mutant June 13, 2013 at 7:26 am #

    The fact that science doesn’t know everything does not make religion (aka “wildly guessing”) a valid position.

    • cspschofield June 13, 2013 at 12:52 pm #

      Ah, but with what we actually, provably, know about when humanity is engendered, ALL POSITIONS about whether a fetus is human are ‘just guessing’. Those of us who believe that a fetus is not human really need to come to grips with the fact that our position is just as faith based as that of the most cartoonish fundamentalist Bab-tist.

      • Atomic Mutant June 13, 2013 at 2:03 pm #

        Nope. For example you can determine the size of the brain, the capability to feel pain, the chances of surviving outside the body, the possibility of self-awareness, etc.etc. – there are many, many factors that can be determined with science. Which of these factors you chose in your decision, is another question and a more philosophical question. But science is perhaps not perfect, but it knows at least some things, so it IS better than “wildly guessing”.

      • Atomic Mutant June 13, 2013 at 5:48 pm #

        It very likely is just a problem of definition, not knowledge. With knowledge we get better definitions. And this knowledge comes from… science, bingo. So, no, sorry, you are wrong, not all positions are “just guessing”.

  2. qewrtg June 25, 2013 at 12:09 pm #

    I’m curious why you don’t think a newborn is human. When does it “become” human?

    • cspschofield June 25, 2013 at 2:19 pm #

      I’m not convinced that it is a particular moment; I think that humanity grows gradually. I have met people in their thirties who I didn’t think had achieved humanity.

      • R Daneel September 16, 2013 at 4:23 pm #

        Yup, I agree. You might look in a mirror a$$hat. By your own calculus then I can choose to abort you.

  3. tinker June 25, 2013 at 12:28 pm #

    While I agree with much of your post, I disagree with your statement that “any position is necessarily a matter of faith”. If we are going to have any law regarding abortion, we must decide when life begins based on what we know. Given this, there are several valid scientific bases to choose from: conception (when the person’s DNA is determined), when the heart starts beating, and when brain waves start.

    I also think most people intuitively understand that a fetus is a person. There are seeming exceptions of course – they might have always been told that he/she isn’t and not really thought about it for themselves, or “convinced” themselves of this view because that’s what they’re supposed to believe. But deep down I think they know. And this knowledge, when confronted with the “societal messages” about abortion, will be internally reconciled by viewing life as disposable or subjective. And this diminishes one’s basic regard for life and smooths the way for much more evil.

  4. jim September 5, 2013 at 1:42 pm #

    Personally, I believe that abortion should be legal. The reason, I was a volunteer firefighter with first aid training, in the early 70’s prior to the roe/wade thing. And on Friday and Saturday evenings got to watch the good baptist and Catholic girls die on the way to the hospital because of the butchers of main street. You see its only natural for things to progress. Boys and girls get interested in each other, and things happen. Now a days its just a pill the next day. Back then, the poor or the girl with the ultra religous family, or up tight family would sacifrice the daughter on the alter of the butcher. Who used witch doctor science to kill, salt, or a cloths hanger. We couldn’t do anything for them. Even had doctor trainees who were limited by law back then crying in the back of the ambulances, One or two would die each weekend, Such a waste.

    • cspschofield September 5, 2013 at 5:08 pm #

      I think that abortion should be legal. I just think that some of the pillocks that have attached themselves to the Pro-Choice movement are going to make it unlikely to STAY legal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: